Comparing Jack and Macbeth

Comparing rogue and Macbeth varlet is an authoritative son whose lead attri andes was used to manipulate the others rather than provide order. He needinesss bump frustrate rid of control, by using his superiority and savage-Like ways. When the tribe was created, It works out of fear, but It Is this tribe that prevails. When zany can no longer control his iron out for attractership, the tribe Is created, which has a negative influence on all the boys. by this character, Gilding shows how the demonic side of society prospers.While the savages were thriving while the hardly a(prenominal) who remained civilized were suffering from extreme famine, and taught. Jack seems to be a part-hungry individual. Jack rapidly gets in charge of the searchers that had to gather the meat for the whole group. Their ardor decides to hunt a pig, and this is when Jack shows his savage personality. Before starting to hunt a pig Jack orders the hunters to paint their own faces with clay in a nat ive manner. This all foreshadows the savage that is about to corrupt the island. Jack shows an attitude towards life that is shown by the mint that succeed in the world.With his pull through attitude he Is encouraging aggressiveness, and detecting his ewer and respect from the rest of the group. He becomes paranoid that Ralph and Piggy are against him and feeds misinformation to his tribe, so as to keep them on his side. Jack Is the complete opposite, representing the evil that lies In the hearts of all mankind. He progressively grows more sadistic and evil as the story goes on, at last orchestrating the death of Simon and Piggy. Macbeth is in like manner homogeneous because he turned evil by listening to the raging ambition within his own personality.Macbeth let himself be manipulated by the three witches, and allowing him to be influenced by his wifes equally raging ambition, this caused more problems like a guilty conscience. It was due to the evil within him and his wife, as well as evil personified in the three witches that Macbeth killed his own king, twain guards who just tried to do their Job of protecting the king, his best virtuoso Banquet, and Macadams defenseless family. Additionally, that evil led him to bring pain and suffering on a mass scale to the entire Scottish nation.In conclusion Macbeth immorality was caused by their ambitions to be leaders, and disappearance of rational thinking, which caused problems with themselves internally, and affected other people. Macbeth is a real egocentric, power-hungry leader. He starts off by existence a liege follower to his king, hesitant to act against Duncan. Macbeth has the ambition but fillinesss the drive to do what is necessary. However, after he becomes king, this attitude changes greatly. He becomes like a dictator. Had Macbeth been a good, able leader, the revolt against him by Macadam, would not have been so fierce.Macbeth becomes very proud, because of his false prophecies. He degr ades those who express fear or concern, and e waves off important Information given to him. His whole concern is keeping his power at all cost. Hes so self-involved and ready to compromise his ethics to get ahead. Macbeth knows that Macadam Is pass judgmenting to oppose him so he hires people to kill Macadams family. No democratic leader would do that, so Macbeth Is plant that he will not have mercy on those who try to oppose him, Leadership Increases for Macbeth because not only he was successful in killing the king but he got the throne. N authoritative leadership approach. Macbeth kill others that can become a threat o him which shows that he is capable of doing a good deal more than he seemed, but cant trust people. He killed Macadams family to show his inaugural. Macbeth is more determined to accomplish his goals and make decisions on his own. Macbeth is being a leader by making his own decision, but he does not listening to anyone elses input which can make his decision o ne-sided. This quality of leadership can ultimately be destructive because of bad decisions, and his initiative has led to an evil path. He is much more assertive than before.Macbeth did represent more determination and energy however a true leader is not Just powerful and strong. Macbeth did seem to be more bold when he said that he does not fear anyone and shall kill anyone that stands in his way. When he says this he seems to be more arrogant than confident. Macbeth shows a lack in confidence because he feels that to be safe he has to gain everyone. If he were confident then he would not feel the need to harm anyone. Despite everything, he continues to stay positive and is determined to do whatever he needs to do in order to maintain his leadership.Macbeth on the there hand shows leadership, however in a much more negative way. Jack on the other hand is similar to Macbeth because Jack is an autocratic tyrant. He beats a boy for no reason other than to exert his power over the boys. He realizes what it takes to get power and to keep power. He rules through fear and intimidation, Jack is also a good manipulator. He knows what the boys both fear and want to hear. contrary Ralph who desires a constructive society, Jack prays on the boys destructive primal instincts.The boys want to be told what to do rather than simply pitch in in concert hey feel the need to live in fear under a leader that they perceive as a powerful protector. In this mind Jack is certainly a more effective leader than Ralph. Jack can be controlling. One example is when Ralph asked his hunters to take care of the release but Jack didnt want that and he took the hunters to hunt because thats what he precious them to do. Another example is when he takes a vote for the next chief. No one votes for him but he sets up his own tribe nonetheless. Jacks litany of evil is pretty impressive. He leads the brutal slaughter of a pigs, and Simon.