The Meaning of Life through Subjectivity

The Meaning of Life through and through SubjectivityHumans argon unobjective because despite seek to stop affecting existence that they argon a part of, they atomic number 18 changing it. This relationship, which causes a change in the world through scrapion, changes any objective view into a inseparable one(a) because they are influencing what a pure look outr cannot. By trying to simply stop doing and spot slightly observe, people attempt to reach a state of pure objectivity. This, however, break downs an unachievable task once one considers that their mere existence is an act in and of itself. Meaning that the except way to become truly objective is to temporarily stop existing, observe purely in that non-existent state, and thusly resume existing within the world as a human organism. To be able to even consider performing these impossible tasks is akin to macrocosm God. In total, it is impossible for a human organism to achieve a state of non existence simply becaus e the mere act of donjon causes one to become subjective due to the fact they leave an influence on the world around them.While they are young, human race at last reach a point when they become aware that their existences are enveloped in exclusivity. They see that their lives are filled with choices, forks in the road which gravel it apparent that whenever one chooses something, something else moldiness be ask outd. These choices can bring the perturb of having to weigh betwixt the options and the respective consequences, as well as approach shot to terms with the idea that one cannot puzzle everything. Considering the human limitation of having to exclude one thing in order to gain another, people lead always reach for a level of objectivity in their choices they wish to remove some of the pain and difficulty that they feel from having to make those choices by detaching themselves emotionally from the choices they have to make. despite the legality of existence lying in subjectiveness, in that location is a paradox shown here that adult male are closely preset to reach for objectivity despite the swear out existing in the other direction beyond subjectivity.To reach the coif of livelihood, one must first come to terms with the truth of existence. Kierkegaards existential truth is subjectivity for a human to understand that subjectivity is the core of existence hence enables them to pursue and eventually understand the answer to life. Subjectivity in itself is chief(prenominal) to grasp as a human, and as a result, it also serves as a differentiation mingled with the simple man and the keen-sighted man. If the wise man is being subjective, he knows that there is a deviance between subjectivity and objectivity. However, the moreover indication that he is being completely subjective at a given point is that he objectively knows the difference between objectivity and subjectivity. This understanding allows him to grasp the concept of the answer to life while at the same time brings up the paradox of only being subjective when being objective. In contrast, if the simple man is being subjective, he is simply being subjective by point of caprice and would not be aware of it. Thus the simple man cannot be considered to have reached the same existential truth as the wise man. To be wise is a curse as well as a blessing, for the paradox teaches him the importance of the existential truth, while at the same time, prevents him from grasp it.Given Kierkegaards belief that the existential truth is subjectivity, that all humans eventually become at least slightly objective and that people submit to be slightly objective in order to be subjective, then a paradox presents itself. If a human cannot be subjective without being objective then this begs the question about whether or not a human reach a state of pure subjectivity.Within the World-Historical view, there is but a single objective truth to any item-by-item event throughout history, but subjectivity shows a different, individual truth for every person viewing it. Seeing that people cannot objectively observe and think over the past (without first accomplishing the impossible task of fair God-like), people are left to view the events themselves from the present, filling in the gaps between objective facts with subjective interpretations. These all compile to subjective truths each being the truth, yet none being any more or less valid than the last. By being human, one is restricted by the world they have subjectively constructed a world made with the subjective truths influenced by their own thoughts, feelings and experiences. However, as partially subjective existences in what can only be perceived as a purely subjective world, one must ask if human beings can really exist in the same world as anyone else and if the answer to that query changes the answer to life itself.This presents us with the final paradox that in order to obtain the a nswer one must be an objective and unmoving entity, but humans as a whole are subjective simply through existence. Were one to find the so-called answer to life, ones life would fundamentally change. However, as a direct result of finding that answer, this newly changed life is essentially a new life in and of itself. This new life is at least slightly different from the old life and, as a result, has a new subjective truth to it. This effectively renders the previous answer worthless, perhaps having never existed to begin with. This in itself proves that the answer cannot be embed in the constantly active life, but only in the static death where the constant, static world is unaffected by a person. Despite this, the answer holds no meaning after death and cannot be communicated to the living resulting in the same lack of truth.As a result, Ive found that Im unable(p) to submit my answer to this lifelong assignment, and that to do so I would have to no longer be considered alive . I apologize and would like to point an extension preferably to sometime in the late 2070s.